Which Joe gave his name to ‘sloppy joes’? We look at five interesting sandwiches and their lexical origins.
Denoting propositions that can both be true, but cannot both be false (e.g., some X are Y and some X are not Y)
- ‘It follows that high or low probability are contrary to necessity of opposite polarity, and subcontrary to possibility of opposite polarity.’
- ‘In traditional logic the I and O statements are considered subcontrary to one another; in other words, they can both be true at the same time, but cannot both be false.’
- ‘The particular statements: I and O are subcontrary: ‘Some S are P’ and ‘Some S are not P’ can be true, but both cannot be false.’
- ‘Paradox seems to arise when conditional statements have subcontrary statements as antecedent and consequent.’
- ‘Similarly, ‘some unicorns have horns’ and ‘some unicorns do not have horns’ are both regarded as false, and so they are not subcontrary.’’
A subcontrary proposition.
- ‘Particular statements are subcontraries. ‘Some man is just’ and ‘some man is not just’ cannot be false together’
- ‘Given that traditional logicians did think the subcontraries have ‘existential import’, how do we resolve the apparent contradiction?’
- ‘Again, I and O propositions are subcontrary, but not contrary or contradictory.’
- ‘The case of subcontraries will be revealed to include an unjustified presupposition in the section concerning the modern square of opposition.’
Late 16th century: from late Latin subcontrarius, translation of Greek hupenantios.
We take a look at several popular, though confusing, punctuation marks.
From Afghanistan to Zimbabwe, discover surprising and intriguing language facts from around the globe.
The definitions of ‘buddy’ and ‘bro’ in the OED have recently been revised. We explore their history and increase in popularity.