Which Joe gave his name to ‘sloppy joes’? We look at five interesting sandwiches and their lexical origins.
Untested or unproven theories when presented as scientific fact.
- ‘Let me just very quickly say that unfortunately for you, John, every day, including this week, we'll have more and more confirmation of what you call junk science by very reputable scientists.’
- ‘I am not one to get overly-excited about junk science theories and am not prone to accepting all the peculiar goings-on with the paranormal.’
- ‘In the past research that can only be described as junk science has been reported as fact by an uncritical media.’
- ‘It is junk science that is unproven and the subject of much serious debate.’
- ‘It is time for the tort system, junk science, and the news media to face up to scientific evidence.’
- ‘In short, my hypothetical study would be properly dismissed as junk science because it fails to use even the most basic statistical controls and techniques.’
- ‘There might be lawyers who use junk science - theories that he or she knows have no acceptance among the scientific community.’
- ‘There is a remarkable reluctance among mainstream scientists and doctors to challenge junk science and expose its dangers, which are substantial.’
- ‘It also doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out this is junk science.’
- ‘It is my evaluation that the Greenhouse Theory is junk science, to put it bluntly.’
We take a look at several popular, though confusing, punctuation marks.
From Afghanistan to Zimbabwe, discover surprising and intriguing language facts from around the globe.
The definitions of ‘buddy’ and ‘bro’ in the OED have recently been revised. We explore their history and increase in popularity.