One of the mysteries of the English language finally explained.
often with negative Used with reference to a comparison regarded as valid because it concerns two things that are fundamentally the same.‘there is no apples-to-apples comparison when comparing a foreign currency to USD’‘you want to compare us to Australia or Great Britain, like it’s apples to apples’
- ‘"The numbers that are out there today are not apples to apples," he says.’
- ‘Unfortunately, you can't get 8 and 16 MB cache versions in the same capacities, which makes it impossible to compare apples to apples.’
- ‘While we try to maintain an apples to apples test environment, we feel the different brands of comparable products should have minimal impact on the final scores.’
- ‘By nature, the lists aren't apples to apples comparisons.’
- ‘This setup should provide as close to apples to apples in terms of hardware configuration.’
- ‘"People have to understand that this comparison is not necessarily apples to apples," he said.’
- ‘Of course this is based on an apples to apples scenario.’
- ‘Simply put, comparing our operations to commercial operations is not an apples to apples proposition.’
- ‘You're going to accept their recommendation, especially if, price-wise, we're talking roughly apples to apples.’
- ‘This virtualization stuff is so new, so tricky and so varied that apples to apples measurements are almost impossible.’
Top tips for CV writingRead more
In this article we explore how to impress employers with a spot-on CV.